| Casinos Online-Internet Gambling | Should You Quit when You're Ahead, or Try for More? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Probability and the 50 50 Bet Jacks or Better Video Poker By the Time Progressives Hit Before You Can Expect to Win? All-or-Nothing Gambles Percentages are Fact, not Opinion (Baccarat) Winners May Need Advice Know What You Can and Can't Control in the Casino $10 bets at double-zero roulette Law, Luck, and the Leningrad Elephant Blackjack Hands Gambling Advice Nickel Slots Simpler is better Spreading money around the craps table Best dealers upcard for Blackjack players Picking numbers and RNGs Results after quitting the game Witless winners Bankrolls Bankrolls 2 Betting Progressions Bank roll fluctuations in Blackjack Flipping a coin Laws of Probability Bad Start to a Game Game Show Comparisons |
Place Betting at Craps Self Help Quiz Quitting While Ahead Betting on Don't Come in Craps House Edge vs. Betting Strategies Anticipating Bankroll Savings Rules to Estimate Chances of Success Even Fighting Edge Beating the Odds to Overcome Edge Strategy for Craps Fans Gambling Books Intuition in Games Betting at Craps How Often Should You Get What You Expect? Can Casinos Predict Jackpots? Gambling Theories, History, and Other Lies Overestimating Your Chances of a Hit Give Lay Bets at Craps a Look-See |
PLAYING IT SMART by ALAN KRIGMAN Should You Quit when You're Ahead, or Try for More? A celebrated school of gambling thought, promulgated primarily by people who wouldn't know the inside of a casino from the canasta corner at a cushy country club, says to quit when you're ahead because the longer you play, the more apt you are to give it back. Like many musty maxims, this banal bromide is isn't really wrong. But it glibly glosses over an inherently intricate issue. It's true that the house has an edge on every bet. This is what ultimately keeps the casinos in business and subsidizes those all-you-can-eat buffets. But the phenomenon is a manifestation of the law of averages. Each patrons is apt to do better or worse than forecast by edge and handle, but the bosses book enough action so these deviations essentially cancel each other out. Say that a person has adequate bankroll and sufficient discipline to ride through the inevitable downswings of a table or machine (two conditions not often met, by the way). Then, playing longer but within ordinary limits of human endurance still leaves the individual in the realm where the volatility of the game dominates the edge. This improves the chance of attaining any specified earnings goal, while unfortunately raising the likelihood of falling to any loss level as well. The effect is evident in the accompanying list. The figures are for blackjack played with perfect Basic Strategy and the same amount bet on a single spot every round. Trends would be similar although details would differ for other situations, and would be less promising as games have greater house advantage or put more of their return percentages in large but infrequent jackpots. Chance of reaching 10-, 20-, and 25-unit
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||